HTN
Hưng Thịnh Incons ·HOSE ·2026Q1
▼▼ Declining sharply
TTM · Applied to: EPS, ROE, ROA, Net Margin, Asset Turnover, Debt/Equity
What Is Changing
On a TTM 2026Q1 basis, HTN posted a very sharp profit drop versus the same period, showing that pressure has clearly fed through to the bottom line — profit is at an all-time high. More notably, operating cash flow is significantly negative relative to profit — this is pressure that needs close monitoring.
| Metric | Q1'26 | Q4'25 | Q3'25 | Q2'25 | Q1'25 | Q4'24 | Q3'24 | Q2'24 | Q1'24 | Q4'23 | Q3'23 | Q2'23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 30.2 | 99.1 | 162.7 | 139.3 | 229.6 | 134.0 | 106.0 | 437.4 | 463.1 | 235.8 | 446.7 | 1,570.2 |
| Growth | -70% | -39% | +17% | -39% | +71% | +26% | -76% | -6% | +96% | -47% | -72% | — |
| Net Income | 2.5 | -27.2 | 1.6 | 16.7 | 27.3 | 4.9 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 10.3 | 32.7 | 1.2 | 48.9 |
| Net Margin | 8.24% | -27.47% | 0.98% | 12.00% | 11.87% | 3.67% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 2.22% | 13.89% | 0.28% | 3.12% |
Drivers of HTN's profit
Net profit attributable to parent declined vs last year, mainly due to lower gross profit. Supporting and offsetting drivers:
Net profit attributable to parent declined vs prior quarter, mainly due to lower gross profit. Supporting and offsetting drivers:
Financial Highlights
Detailed analysis of each financial dimension
ROE = Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier
ROE fell from 2.2% to -0.4% — all three components weakened, with asset turnover being the main drag.
Is the profit sustainable?
Margins narrowed but earnings quality remains clean — pressure is mainly operational.
What is driving the margin?
Net margin fell to -1.49%, losing 5.3pp. The main pressure comes from SG&A / Revenue rose 5.5pp and Gross margin fell 0.7pp (in addition, Other profit / Revenue rose 0.9pp added support while Net financial result / Revenue fell 0.9pp remained a drag).
The pressure comes from core operations — this is a concerning type of decline, not a one-off movement.
Profitability trend
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Is capital being used efficiently?
Capital efficiency for construction contractors should be read alongside project progress and receivables collection from developers — ROIC of -0.2% fluctuates with handover cycles.
Is capital being deployed efficiently?
ROIC narrowed to -0.15%, falling 1.2pp. That translates to -0.15 in after-tax operating profit for every 100 units of operating capital. Both NOPAT margin narrowed 5.6pp and capital turnover fell 0.13x, with invested capital holding roughly steady — pressure came from both operational efficiency and asset efficiency.
For construction contractors, ROIC moves with backlog and project acceptance timing — this is a reference signal and should be read alongside working-capital cycles.
CAPITAL EFFICIENCY TREND
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Balance Sheet
ROIC for construction contractors swings with project progress and handover cycles — the balance sheet below adds perspective. Leverage runs above the construction contractors average — project acceptance cycles warrant monitoring — liabilities at 3.72x equity, net debt at 1.31x equity.
Over the last 12 months, working capital released 477.6bn of cash, mainly thanks to lower receivables and higher payables. Pressure from higher inventories only partly offset that benefit.
Working Capital Drivers
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Working Capital Efficiency
Cash conversion cycle lengthened by 864.1 days versus the same period last year. The main moves came from DIO rose 196.1 days, DSO rose 1174.5 days, and DPO rose 506.5 days.
Working capital cycle lengthened mainly due to slower receivables collection — receivables quality needs monitoring.
For construction contractors, DSO/DIO/DPO/CCC can be distorted by project progress, work-in-progress receivables, and milestone acceptance timing — these metrics should be read alongside developer payment cycles.
Watchpoints
CCC stands at 1852.5 days, suggesting that working capital remains tied up for a relatively long operating cycle.
DSO increased by +1174.5 days, pointing to slower receivables turnover.
Working Capital Efficiency
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Is financial risk significant?
Check leverage, liquidity, and cash-flow conversion.
Leverage & Liquidity
Leverage warrants monitoring, with net debt / equity at 1.31x and interest coverage only at -0.03x.
At present, short-term debt accounts for 62.0% of total debt, cash equals 3.6% of debt, and total debt stands at 2,111.5bn.
Leverage for construction contractors fluctuates with project working capital, performance guarantees, and progress receivables — should be read alongside receivables quality and developer payment cycles.
Watchpoints
Net debt / equity stands at 1.31x, increasing balance-sheet pressure.
Interest coverage is -0.03x, leaving limited room to absorb financing costs.
Leverage and liquidity trend
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Cash Flow
With safe leverage noted above, cash flow below shows the self-funding capacity. Operating cash flow reached 590.5bn in 2025, against investing cash flow of -530.4bn.
Post-investment cash flow was positive +60.1bn. Financing cash flow was negative +73.6bn.
CFO / net income was -91.30x.
Track how much investment can be funded internally from operating cash flow.
For construction contractors, FCF swings sharply with project progress and payment cycles — should be read alongside backlog and receivables quality.
Cash Conversion
TTM Cash Conversion · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Investment Takeaway
The business is under real pressure, but the current picture has not turned broadly adverse. A notable area has clearly weakened, making the near-term outlook hard to call bright; even so, other parts of the business are still holding up, with margins remain under pressure remaining the main constraint, with net margin down 5.3 pp. The next watchpoint is the earnings mix, when non-core contribution is 20.6%.
Watchpoint: the earnings mix still needs monitoring, with net financial result still accounting for 20.6% of PBT and CFO / net income currently at -91.30x.
Key risk: profitability remains under pressure, with trailing-12M net margin at -1.49% after a 5.3pp decline versus the same period last year.
Statement Data
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Net Revenue
|
630.7 | 1,140.5 | 2,681.5 | 5,464.5 | 6,163.7 |
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
587.9 | 1,060.3 | 2,459.2 | 5,029.4 | 0.0 |
|
Gross Profit
|
42.8 | 80.2 | 222.3 | 435.1 | 489.5 |
|
Financial Expenses
|
230.4 | 263.8 | 252.3 | 244.6 | -189.8 |
|
Selling Expenses
|
— | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | -0.0 |
|
General and Administrative Expenses
|
41.6 | 40.5 | 66.7 | 132.5 | -112.3 |
|
Operating Profit
|
28.6 | 36.3 | 45.6 | 132.0 | 281.9 |
|
Profit Before Tax
|
25.2 | 31.1 | 51.1 | 124.0 | 302.5 |
|
Net Income
|
18.3 | 25.6 | 60.3 | 64.0 | 241.0 |
|
Profit Attributable to Parent
|
18.4 | 25.3 | 60.0 | 63.6 | 241.0 |
|
Earnings per Share
|
199.00 | 276.00 | 653.00 | 686.00 | 4,379.00 |
Explore Other Stocks In The Same Sector
VCG, SJG, PC1, LLM, CTD, DPG, SCG, L40, HBC, CC1, DSH, L18, DC4, LHC, ICN, SJE, LCG, S55, HMS, TED, CIG, TCD, S99, PVV, FCN, C4G, DCF, HAN, TTL, HEC, SDT, C47, ACC, GTS, CCC, HVH, SC5, L10, VSI, VC6, CHS, PQN, LIG, CMS, TSA, TA9, G36, XMC, VIW, SRF, SD5, MST, PHC, BMK, DLR, VCC, ICG, VC2, DIH, DRH, LM8, CDC, ALV, PPS, PXS, HC1, V12, DC1, XLV, GH3, HFB, SD2, VC1, DC2, NDX, CT6, CH5, HU1, VE1, L12, E29, SJM, QTC, VE9, TV6, VSE, LMI, RCC, HTE, PXT, C92, PEN, PTD, CID, PVX, TA6, CDR, RCD, QCC, SCI, TL4, CDO, L63, PTO, VC9, TEL, LG9, CX8, CT3, PXI, CI5, TS3, ICI, MES, LM3, ACS, LCD, H11, VE4, VE3, CIP, MCO, PVA, S12, SDP, L35, VCE, SD7, VE2, CLG, LUT, HU3, HAS, LO5, L43, SD4, TST, VW3, E12, L45, PVH, VMC, MCG, SDD, LCS, VXB, VE8, LM7, MEC, UDC, SD6, L61, SHG, L62, VVN, TKC, DFF, C12, L44, NTB, S96, SD8, SDB, TNM, VC5
Need support? If you need support with content lookup or want to provide feedback about content on the website, please contact us below.