SJG
Tổng Công ty Sông Đà - CTCP ·UPCOM ·2026Q1
▲▲ Improving positively
TTM · Applied to: EPS, ROE, ROA, Net Margin, Asset Turnover, Debt/Equity
What Is Changing
On a TTM 2026Q1 basis, SJG has not accelerated revenue sharply, but profitability is improving visibly — profit is at an all-time high. Profit growth is driven mainly by better operations rather than scale expansion — a foundation that tends to be more durable.
| Metric | Q1'26 | Q4'25 | Q3'25 | Q2'25 | Q1'25 | Q4'24 | Q3'24 | Q2'24 | Q1'24 | Q4'23 | Q3'23 | Q2'23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,250.2 | 1,511.9 | 1,981.9 | 1,841.3 | 1,306.9 | 1,332.1 | 1,495.1 | 1,400.0 | 1,037.2 | 1,572.8 | 1,832.7 | 1,339.2 |
| Growth | -17% | -24% | +8% | +41% | -2% | -11% | +7% | +35% | -34% | -14% | +37% | — |
| Net Income | 169.5 | 661.6 | 422.2 | 315.4 | 63.0 | 423.9 | 343.1 | 176.4 | 28.0 | 117.8 | 228.0 | 132.4 |
| Net Margin | 13.56% | 43.76% | 21.30% | 17.13% | 4.82% | 31.82% | 22.94% | 12.60% | 2.70% | 7.49% | 12.44% | 9.89% |
Drivers of SJG's profit
Net profit attributable to parent increased vs last year, mainly helped by better other profit. Supporting and offsetting drivers:
Net profit attributable to parent increased vs prior quarter, mainly helped by higher gross profit. Supporting and offsetting drivers:
Financial Highlights
Detailed analysis of each financial dimension
ROE = Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier
ROE rose from 11.0% to 16.0% — mainly driven by net margin, despite leverage moving in the opposite direction.
Is the profit sustainable?
Margins are improving and earnings quality is solid — a durable foundation for ROE.
What is driving the margin?
Net margin expanded to 23.82%, rising 5.6pp. Core operating signals are improving as SG&A / Revenue fell 2.8pp are enough to offset pressure from Gross margin fell 0.8pp (with additional support from Other profit / Revenue rose 6.1pp and Net financial result / Revenue rose 0.5pp).
Most of the margin increase comes from non-core items — core operations have not kept pace, this is a margin expansion to watch carefully.
Profitability trend
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Is capital being used efficiently?
Capital efficiency for construction contractors should be read alongside project progress and receivables collection from developers — ROIC of 8.3% fluctuates with handover cycles.
Is capital being deployed efficiently?
ROIC edged up to 8.33%, rising 1.3pp. That translates to 8.33 in after-tax operating profit for every 100 units of operating capital. Both NOPAT margin rose 0.3pp and capital turnover rose 0.07x, with invested capital holding roughly steady — capital-return quality improved from both sides.
For construction contractors, ROIC moves with backlog and project acceptance timing — this is a reference signal and should be read alongside working-capital cycles.
CAPITAL EFFICIENCY TREND
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Balance Sheet
ROIC for construction contractors swings with project progress and handover cycles — the balance sheet below adds perspective. Capital structure is relatively light for construction contractors — liabilities at 1.20x equity, net debt at 0.46x equity.
Over the last 12 months, working capital absorbed 418.0bn of cash, mainly because of higher receivables. Part of that drag was offset by lower inventories and higher payables.
Working Capital Drivers
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Working Capital Efficiency
Working capital is being managed more efficiently, supporting overall capital efficiency. Cash conversion cycle improved by 51.8 days versus the same period last year. The main moves came from DIO fell 39.2 days, DSO fell 37.4 days, and DPO fell 24.8 days.
Improvement comes mainly from faster inventory turnover — watch whether this trend persists in coming periods.
For construction contractors, DSO/DIO/DPO/CCC can be distorted by project progress, work-in-progress receivables, and milestone acceptance timing — these metrics should be read alongside developer payment cycles.
Watchpoints
CCC stands at 197.3 days, suggesting that working capital remains tied up for a relatively long operating cycle.
Working Capital Efficiency
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Is financial risk significant?
Financial risk is low — leverage is safe, both CFO and FCF are positive.
Leverage & Liquidity
Leverage is balanced for now, with net debt / equity at 0.46x and interest coverage at 2.18x.
At present, short-term debt accounts for 50.6% of total debt, cash equals 21.6% of debt, and total debt stands at 6,121.8bn.
Leverage for construction contractors fluctuates with project working capital, performance guarantees, and progress receivables — should be read alongside receivables quality and developer payment cycles.
Watchpoints
Cash / debt stands at 21.6%, leaving limited liquidity buffer to monitor.
Leverage and liquidity trend
TTM YoY · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Cash Flow
With safe leverage noted above, cash flow below shows the self-funding capacity. Operating cash flow reached 1,813.0bn in 2025, against investing cash flow of -59.0bn.
Post-investment cash flow was positive +1,754.0bn. Financing cash flow was negative +1,656.2bn.
CFO / net income was 1.21x.
After spending +103.1bn on fixed-asset investment, the business generated trailing free cash flow of +1,425.0bn.
For construction contractors, FCF swings sharply with project progress and payment cycles — should be read alongside backlog and receivables quality.
Cash Conversion
TTM Cash Conversion · 2025Q1 -> 2026Q1
Investment Takeaway
The business is showing brightening signals, but the improvement is still early and not yet thick enough to read as a confirmed trend. The brighter spot is operating efficiency, with net margin improving 5.6 pp. The next item to monitor is the earnings mix, when non-core contribution is 22.0%.
Improvement: operating efficiency is getting better, with trailing-12M net margin at 23.82% after expanding 5.6pp versus the same period last year.
Watchpoint: cash flow is currently keeping pace with accounting earnings, with CFO / net income at 1.21x. Even so, net financial result still accounts for 22.0% of PBT, so the earnings mix still needs monitoring.
Statement Data
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Net Revenue
|
6,620.8 | 5,531.4 | 5,583.6 | 5,428.3 | 5,947.6 |
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
5,247.6 | 4,235.1 | 4,408.3 | 3,756.4 | 0.0 |
|
Gross Profit
|
1,373.2 | 1,296.4 | 1,175.3 | 1,671.8 | 1,413.1 |
|
Financial Expenses
|
654.7 | 709.4 | 893.8 | 904.8 | -769.3 |
|
Selling Expenses
|
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | -1.6 |
|
General and Administrative Expenses
|
400.2 | 446.3 | 404.6 | 2,359.1 | -300.9 |
|
Operating Profit
|
1,832.9 | 1,007.2 | 711.7 | 2,242.0 | 676.3 |
|
Profit Before Tax
|
2,193.1 | 991.7 | 694.5 | 2,175.9 | 650.0 |
|
Net Income
|
1,983.6 | 855.7 | 515.2 | 1,816.5 | 549.0 |
|
Profit Attributable to Parent
|
1,696.4 | 613.7 | 431.6 | 1,521.5 | 333.3 |
|
Earnings per Share
|
3,774.00 | 1,365.00 | 960.00 | 3,375.00 | 741.00 |
Explore Other Stocks In The Same Sector
VCG, PC1, LLM, CTD, DPG, SCG, L40, HBC, CC1, DSH, L18, DC4, LHC, ICN, SJE, LCG, S55, HMS, TED, CIG, TCD, S99, PVV, FCN, C4G, DCF, HAN, TTL, HEC, SDT, C47, ACC, GTS, CCC, HVH, SC5, L10, VSI, VC6, CHS, PQN, LIG, CMS, TSA, TA9, G36, XMC, VIW, SRF, SD5, MST, PHC, BMK, DLR, VCC, ICG, HTN, VC2, DIH, DRH, LM8, CDC, ALV, PPS, PXS, HC1, V12, DC1, XLV, GH3, HFB, SD2, VC1, DC2, NDX, CT6, CH5, HU1, VE1, L12, E29, SJM, QTC, VE9, TV6, VSE, LMI, RCC, HTE, PXT, C92, PEN, PTD, CID, PVX, TA6, CDR, RCD, QCC, SCI, TL4, CDO, L63, PTO, VC9, TEL, LG9, CX8, CT3, PXI, CI5, TS3, ICI, MES, LM3, ACS, LCD, H11, VE4, VE3, CIP, MCO, PVA, S12, SDP, L35, VCE, SD7, VE2, CLG, LUT, HU3, HAS, LO5, L43, SD4, TST, VW3, E12, L45, PVH, VMC, MCG, SDD, LCS, VXB, VE8, LM7, MEC, UDC, SD6, L61, SHG, L62, VVN, TKC, DFF, C12, L44, NTB, S96, SD8, SDB, TNM, VC5
Need support? If you need support with content lookup or want to provide feedback about content on the website, please contact us below.